Sunday, April 11, 2010

How To Do Your Hair Like Dahvie Vanity

Why?

The central idea of writing a blog, an online diary secret, confidential and inaccessible is to be able to give vent to their thoughts so free.

It is therefore not possible to express themselves freely in the presence of an audience?
Yes and no.
Yes, because it could potentially give voice to that same thought, same with the same conviction.
No, for two simple reasons:
1) the act of communication, it is necessary change the natural way to formulate their ideas to fit who draws from it. You are concerned to immediately understand a central message and lose the shades. In fact, as clear and straightforward my rhetoric may seem to me, could give rise to misunderstanding.
"How can I make myself understood? I explained clearly enough? "Interacting
means to transmit to a person who has different terms of expression, and this changes the shape;
2) communication requires an end. For this reason, when where I had to speak to someone, even making an effort to understand the utter emptiness of my "free thinking", set in motion, along with my message, a cumbersome mechanism.
"What did I press? What is left of my useless bla bla bla? "Expose yourself
means voluntarily become vulnerable to others' opinion, this change is the intention.

In essence, it says the same thing with different words and with a different purpose.
bring everything back to the main question: writing only for myself, I make sure that a kind of spontaneity, so that stuffing my thoughts at any point coincides with what I write.

It is absolutely not the case.

Strange to say, but rereading the previous post I realize that I have tried in every way, from the smallest detail layout to suit a more sophisticated choice of (1), through an unconscious but ruthless censorship (2), to make it readable (1) and do not disappoint (2) a player who had previously been excluded from my analysis: myself.
hide my weaknesses, do not consider pathetic, makes fascinating and interesting, here are the engines of my improvised literature.

That makes me weak, pathetic, little fascinating and interesting? Rather, it teaches me to be lenient by answering a resounding "No".

0 comments:

Post a Comment